The Board denied the appellant's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or at the housebound rate due to his service-connected disabilities not meeting the criteria.
The deciding factor: The appellant did not meet the criteria for needing regular aid and attendance or being housebound as defined by VA regulations.
- Claimed conditions
- skull defect, paralysis of the right facial nerve, complete right eye tarsorrhaphy and normal vision in the left eye, right ear deafness, retracted right eardrum
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 26, 2002
- Citation
- 0213042
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0213042.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevent her from attending to the needs of nature, caring for herself, or protecting herself from the hazards of her environment. The Board has determined that she is in need of regular aid and attendance due to her service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected conditions did not prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation prior to July 19, 2017.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's death was not due to willful misconduct, but he did not meet the criteria for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 as his service-connected disabilities were not rated at 100% disabling for a continuous period of at least one year prior to his death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining service personnel records and medical evidence from Camp Lejeune. The appellant is also required to provide any relevant VA or private treatment records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.