The Board finds that the veteran's chronic lymphedema with recurrent cellulitis of the right lower extremity is at least as likely as not caused by the July 1992 VA surgery, and thus grants compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The deciding factor: The September 2000 VA examination report supports a causal link between the veteran's chronic lymphedema with recurrent cellulitis of the right lower extremity and the July 1992 VA surgery, finding that the lymphedema was due to the treatment in question and had resulted in recurrent episodes of cellulitis.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic lymphedema, recurrent cellulitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 10, 2002
- Citation
- 0214114
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0214114.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment allowance is remanded due to unclear functional loss in his lower extremities resulting from service-connected disabilities. The Board finds a pre-decisional duty to assist error occurred by failing to schedule the Veteran for a VA examination.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew their appeal concerning increased ratings for left knee and lumbosacral strains, and for chronic lymphedema.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for chronic lymphedema, finding that the Veteran's condition is secondary to filariasis due to an inservice mosquito bite. Service connection for a separate skin disorder was denied as there is no evidence of current or active skin issues during the appeal period.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient explanation in the examiner's opinion regarding the Veteran's lay reports of his foot disorder.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.