The Board denied a rating in excess of 30 percent for postoperative left nephrectomy, finding that the veteran's symptoms did not meet criteria for a higher rating.
The deciding factor: The veteran's kidney function and blood pressure were consistently within normal limits or below the threshold required for a higher disability rating.
- Claimed conditions
- carcinoma of the kidney
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 17, 2002
- Citation
- 0214479
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0214479.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for carcinoma of the bladder and kidney, finding that it is not established by direct evidence or due to exposure to ionizing radiation. The preponderance of the evidence did not support a link between the cancer and service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's carcinoma of the kidney was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, including exposure to herbicides, and thus he is denied service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's renal cell carcinoma was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and may not be presumed to have been incurred during such service due to his presumed herbicide exposure. The Board found that the evidence does not support a finding of service connection for the Veteran's kidney cancer.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his claims, including obtaining medical records from Johns Hopkins Hospital and other providers.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.