The Board dismissed the veteran's appeal because he did not timely file a substantive appeal regarding his initial compensable disability rating for left testicular atrophy.
The deciding factor: The veteran failed to timely perfect an appeal of the November 1992 RO decision, which assigned a noncompensable disability rating for his service-connected left testicular atrophy.
- Claimed conditions
- left testicular atrophy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 4, 2002
- Citation
- 0215626
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0215626.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for an adequate medical examination regarding the functionality of his left testis, which could impact the rating assigned for his service-connected left testicular atrophy.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for left varicocele, status post-surgery with neurological manifestations was denied. However, the Board granted a separate 10 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 7120 for symptoms of intermittent edema and aching in the left leg after prolonged walking.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for left testicular atrophy with hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction associated with vasectomy-related genital trauma due to inadequate development of the evidentiary record.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a compensable initial rating for left testicular atrophy was denied as there is no evidence of complete atrophy or removal of both testicles. The benefit of the doubt did not apply, and SMC for loss of one creative organ was granted instead.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.