The Board has granted a total disability rating for compensation effective November 9, 2002, based on the veteran's service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The evidence is in equipoise with respect to whether or not an increase in the veteran's service-connected disabilities occurred on February 5, 1998, which caused him to be unable to obtain and retain employment. The Board resolved all doubt in favor of the veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- status post myocardial infarction with hypertension, incomplete occlusion of the left carotid artery with weakness of the right upper extremity, weakness of the right lower extremity, hypertension with hypertensive retinopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- November 13, 2002
- Citation
- 0216239
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0216239.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeals for entitlement to an increased rating for weakness of the right lower extremity with drop foot and for financial assistance for automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment only, as the appellant withdrew his appeal through his authorized representative.
- Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus was found to have originated during service and the claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent since November 30, 2009, for hypertension with hypertensive retinopathy is granted. The claims for bilateral hearing loss, bilateral knee disorder, and upper and lower back disorders are remanded.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for SMC based on housebound status from June 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008 due to insufficient evidence showing a single service-connected disability rated at 100% and additional disabilities that would qualify him for SMC.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims due to failure to adhere to the remand directives, and the Veteran failed to report for scheduled VA examinations. The case is now being returned to the RO for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.