The Board denied the veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for residuals of cholecystectomy with incidental appendectomy, finding that his symptoms are no more than mild.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show any functional impairment attributable to the cholecystectomy and is against a finding that residuals were severe.
- Claimed conditions
- cholecystectomy, incidental appendectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- December 31, 2002
- Citation
- 0218803
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0218803.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings and granted service connection for bilateral tinnitus.
- Denied
The Board denied a rating in excess of 40 percent for the Veteran's lumbar spine disability and remanded claims for service connection for restless leg syndrome, cholecystectomy, and right lower extremity radiculopathy.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a hysterectomy, recurrent pregnancy loss, appendectomy status post fecaliths appendix (appendectomy), and cholecystectomy as there was no evidence of injury or disease during active duty for training at Camp Lejeune in July 1981, and the current disabilities were not related to active service.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for pre-diabetes, cholecystectomy, a liver disability (non-alcoholic fatty liver), lung disability (pleural effusion), and an acquired psychiatric disorder (major depressive disorder and/or PTSD) due to lack of evidence supporting a link between these conditions and the Veteran's military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.