The evidence does not establish that the veteran's current right wrist disorder with scar on forearm is related to service, and thus his claim for service connection is denied.
The deciding factor: There is no medical nexus between the veteran's current right wrist disorder with right forearm scar and active service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of right wrist injury, scar on right forearm
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 15, 2003
- Citation
- 0300826
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,643 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0300826.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected scars of the chest, bilateral legs, and right forearm are being remanded for further evaluation due to conflicting information regarding their severity.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased evaluations were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation for his scars, and his residuals of a right little finger fracture do not warrant an increase in evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a hysterectomy due to an inadequate medical opinion regarding whether any current residuals are related to service.,Service connection will be considered on a direct basis, meaning that the condition must have been incurred in or aggravated by active duty.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's character of discharge from service for the period prior to February 2, 1991 was not a bar to VA benefits. However, his subsequent service during and after this period is considered dishonorable, thus barring him from receiving VA compensation benefits for any diseases or injuries incurred or aggravated during these periods.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.