The veteran's service-connected vascular insufficiency of the right calf is currently productive of intermittent edema and aching/fatigue in the leg following prolonged standing or walking, with symptoms relieved by elevation of the extremity or compression hosiery. The RO denied an increased evaluation for this condition.
The deciding factor: The veteran's current symptomatology does not warrant a higher rating as his vascular insufficiency is currently productive of intermittent edema and aching/fatigue in the leg following prolonged standing or walking, with symptoms relieved by elevation of the extremity or compression hosiery. The amputation rule limits the combined rating for disabilities of an extremity to the rating for amputation at the elective level (lower 2/3 of his right thigh).
- Claimed conditions
- vascular insufficiency of the right calf, residuals of a gunshot wound to the right thigh
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 22, 2003
- Citation
- 0301213
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,710 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0301213.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional STRs and clinical records related to his right thigh gunshot wound. The claim will be reconsidered with this information.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by his representative, and the issues are dismissed.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's initial disability rating for residuals of a gunshot wound to the right thigh has been denied as his condition does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to concerns about accurately rating the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, particularly his right thigh conditions. The Veteran needs a new examination to assess current severity of his residuals and scar.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.