The Board denied the veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for her appendectomy scar due to her failure to report for several VA examinations.
The deciding factor: The appellant failed to report for multiple scheduled VA examinations, and thus the Board could not evaluate the manifestations of her disability under 38 C.F.R. § 3.655(b).
- Claimed conditions
- appendectomy scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 23, 2003
- Citation
- 0301283
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0301283.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and initial compensable ratings, as well as service connection for various conditions, except for a scar related to a laminectomy which was granted with an effective date of March 22, 2021.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew all active appeals regarding the service connection issues listed in his May 18, 2022 Notice of Disagreement. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for effective dates earlier than November 10, 2021 are granted. The Board has also remanded the claim of service connection for left long finger extensor tenosynovitis.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings and service connection was denied. The Veteran is not entitled to an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his appendectomy scar, as the symptoms do not meet the criteria for a higher rating under DC 7804.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for residuals of right ring finger dislocation was also denied. The Board found that there is no evidence of ankylosis or limitation of motion beyond what is already provided by the current non-compensable rating.,Service connection for degenerative joint disease secondary to residuals of right ring finger dislocation was not granted, as there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.