Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for filariasis and special monthly compensation based on need of regular aid and attendance due to his service-connected spinal cord atrophy with idiopathic paraplegia, as there is no evidence showing that filariasis was incurred in or aggravated by service. The veteran's current 10% rating for the service-connected condition does not meet the requirements for special monthly compensation based on need of regular aid and attendance.

The deciding factor: The Board found that there is no competent medical evidence linking the claimed filariasis to service, nor did it find any evidence showing that the veteran's spinal cord atrophy with idiopathic paraplegia was due to exposure to Agent Orange or another service connection basis. The veteran's current rating for his service-connected condition does not meet the requirements for special monthly compensation based on need of regular aid and attendance.

Claimed conditions
filariasis, spinal cord atrophy with idiopathic paraplegia with residuals from gunshot wound to the right hip
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
January 28, 2003
Citation
0301586

Veterans Law Judge

C. W. Symanski

Decisions by this judge: 1,012 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0301586.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.