The case is being remanded to the VAMC for additional development, including obtaining missing medical records and determining whether authorization was obtained for the private eye care expenses incurred from February 23, 1999, to May 28, 1999.
The deciding factor: The claim must be remanded due to an incomplete record that does not contain relevant documents related to the veteran's private medical treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- Eye condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 6, 2003
- Citation
- 0302292
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,419 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0302292.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, including insomnia, is granted. The respiratory and eye conditions are remanded for further evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a heart condition, eye condition, and neck condition due to insufficient medical opinions and missed VA examinations. The Veteran is advised to attend the newly scheduled VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of service connection for a heart, eye, and neck condition to the AOJ for further development.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for all claims, including a compensable rating for pseudofolliculitis barbae and service connection for various other conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.