The Board has remanded the case for a determination on whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen a claim of service connection for the residuals of a cerebral vascular accident as secondary to hypertension. The issue of special monthly compensation by reason of the need for aid and attendance or being housebound will be considered after this determination.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the issue of new and material evidence is intertwined with the service connection claim, necessitating its resolution first.
- Claimed conditions
- cerebral vascular accident
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 6, 2003
- Citation
- 0303883
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 541 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0303883.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and effective dates are being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records, including those from the Miami VAMC and scanned into VistA.
- Granted
The veteran's service-connected PTSD and other disabilities qualify him for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) and special monthly compensation based on housebound status.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for hypertension with secondary cerebral vascular accident and residuals, as well as a lung disorder to include as due to exposure to herbicide agents, asbestos, and exhaust fumes. The claims were based on direct evidence of the conditions rather than presumptive or secondary service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that there is no evidence linking any of his service-connected disabilities to his causes of death.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.