The Board found that the veteran's scars from his shrapnel wound to the right leg do not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation, as they are manifested by symptoms in an unexceptional disability picture and do not more nearly approximate tender or painful scarring.
The deciding factor: The veteran's scars did not show any symptoms that would warrant a higher rating under the applicable VA rating criteria.
- Claimed conditions
- shrapnel wound
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 10, 2003
- Citation
- 0304191
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,613 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0304191.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of a scrotal shrapnel wound and denied an increased rating for erectile dysfunction.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's muscle injuries, specifically a need for an examination and opinion on the severity of his condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for the residuals of a shrapnel wound to the left lower extremity due to new and material evidence. The case is remanded for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and arranging for a VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a separate rating for disfigurement due to shrapnel wound, but denied an increased rating and TDIU. The case is being remanded for the Veteran to submit a VA Form 21-8940.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.