The Board found no evidence of a current dental condition related to the veteran's inservice Vincent's angina and concluded that it did not cause his current periodontal disease.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner determined that the veteran's trench mouth resolved with treatment, leaving no residual disability and bearing no relationship to his post-service periodontal disease.
- Claimed conditions
- Vincent's angina (trench mouth)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 17, 2003
- Citation
- 0304901
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,642 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0304901.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of Vincent's angina (trench mouth), including missing teeth, finding that there was no evidence linking his current dental condition to his in-service trench mouth.
- Denied
The Board finds that the veteran's trench mouth during service was an acute and transitory disorder that resolved with treatment, leaving no residual disability. Therefore, it is denied as service connection.
- Denied
The Board finds that the veteran's trench mouth during service was an acute and transitory disorder that resolved with treatment, leaving no residual disability. The VA examiner concluded that the current dental problems are more likely related to normal periodontal disease rather than the inservice trench mouth.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.