The Board has referred the case back to the RO due to a cancelled VA examination, and instructed them to conduct a new examination and take any necessary measures under the VCAA.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because of an unexplained cancellation of a requested VA examination by the RO.
- Claimed conditions
- elevated cholesterol levels
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 24, 2003
- Citation
- 0305402
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,480 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0305402.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for a lumbar spine disability and right leg radiculopathy, but denied service connection for cervical spine disability, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, sleep apnea, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and elevated cholesterol levels.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for coronary artery disease, finding that the Veteran's elevated cholesterol levels in service were a risk factor for developing this condition.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is service-connected due to presumed exposure to Agent Orange, but his elevated cholesterol levels are not.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension and elevated cholesterol levels, which he claims are related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The case has been remanded due to the need to review additional evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.