The veteran's coronary artery disease, status post myocardial infarction was manifested with a workload of greater than 7 METs but not greater than 10 METs from October 21, 1998 to April 30, 1999. A rating in excess of 10 percent for this period is not warranted.
The deciding factor: The veteran's coronary artery disease did not meet the criteria for a higher than 10 percent evaluation during this time frame as there was no evidence of workload capacity limited to greater than 5 METs but no greater than 7 METs or cardiac hypertrophy/dilatation.
- Claimed conditions
- Coronary artery disease, status post myocardial infarction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 31, 2003
- Citation
- 0306086
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,987 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0306086.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied a rating in excess of 30 percent for coronary artery disease and remanded the claim for interstitial lung disease due to an inadequate VA examination.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted an effective date of August 14, 2016 for a 100 percent disability rating for the Veteran's service-connected coronary artery disease. The decision is based on the fact that the condition worsened and met the criteria for a 100 percent disability rating prior to this date.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied an increased rating for the Veteran's service-connected heart disability and PTSD, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for coronary artery disease, status post myocardial infarction, was granted with an effective date of October 14, 2011. The appeal is resolved in favor of the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.