The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection due to frostbite, finding that there was no clear and unmistakable error in the September 1945 and October 1946 rating decisions denying service connection. The RO reopened the veteran's claim on August 20, 1996, and granted service connection with an effective date of August 20, 1996.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was no clear and unmistakable error in the September 1945 and October 1946 rating decisions denying service connection for frostbite as the evidence then of record did not show a current disability.
- Claimed conditions
- frozen feet
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 7, 2003
- Citation
- 0306686
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 541 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0306686.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions and an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss, finding no evidence of a current disability or in-service incurrence.
- Partly granted
The veteran's request for a higher disability rating for tinnitus was denied. All other claims for service connection were remanded for further review.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for other specified trauma and stressor related disorder, but denied service connection for athlete's foot and frozen feet. The Veteran was found to have symptoms consistent with other specified trauma-and-stressor-related disorder due to in-service events, while the evidence did not support a diagnosis of athlete's foot or frozen feet.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for frozen feet, increased rating for sinusitis, and earlier effective date for bilateral hearing loss were denied. The claim for service connection of frozen feet was reopened but not granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.