The Board denied reopening the claim for service connection of a left eye disorder and denied an increased evaluation for laceration scar residuals of the right elbow. The veteran's appeal is not about service connection at all.
The deciding factor: The evidence received since the March 1990 rating decision did not provide new and material evidence to reopen the claim for service connection for a left eye disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- Laceration Scar Residuals of Right Elbow, Left Eye Disorder
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 10, 2003
- Citation
- 0306905
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 271 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0306905.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's rating for left eye disorder was reduced from 20% to 0%, effective June 9, 2020. Her claim for increased rating of sarcoidosis was denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's PTSD is granted with an initial evaluation of 50 percent prior to February 20, 2020. The RO has remanded the issues regarding service connection for Skin Cancer and Left Eye Disorder due to insufficient evidence.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a disorder of the left eye, a disorder of the left hand, and manifested by left-side weakness due to lack of medical nexus between current disabilities and service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete findings in previous VA examinations and a need for further clarification of certain medical records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.