The Board denied the claim of service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, finding that there was no evidence linking any of the conditions to his military service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner could not conclude that any injury in service resulted in the veteran's demise due to lack of clear causation.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral pulmonary embolism, edema and vascular stasis of the lower extremities, left bronchogenic carcinoma with generalized carcinomatosis
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 21, 2003
- Citation
- 0307561
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,458 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0307561.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient VA medical opinions and procedural errors. The Veteran is seeking service connection for bilateral pulmonary embolism, left ankle condition, and right ankle condition, all of which are related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral pulmonary embolism and an eye disability, including chronic open angle glaucoma, nodular scleritis, blepharitis, and dry eye syndrome. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions began during service or are related to in-service events.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred for a bilateral pulmonary embolism treatment at Bronson Methodist Hospital is being remanded due to the VA not considering it under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1728 and 38 C.F.R. §§ 17.120-32.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA examinations are inadequate and remands both issues for further development, including obtaining a medical opinion on the nature of the Veteran's DVT and whether it was aggravated by his service-connected right knee strain.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.