The veteran is seeking service connection for a below-the-knee amputation of the left leg, which he claims is secondary to his service-connected shell fragment wound. The case has been remanded due to issues with notification and development under the VCAA.
The deciding factor: The claim was not properly notified of the provisions of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA) and required additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Claimed conditions
- below-the-knee amputation of the left leg
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2003
- Citation
- 0307929
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,710 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0307929.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for a below-the-knee amputation of the left leg and special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance/housebound.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's death was not caused by any of his service-connected disabilities, including post-phlebitic syndrome and its associated medications. The VA examiner concluded that these conditions were unrelated to the fatal intra-cerebral hemorrhage.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's death was caused by diabetes mellitus, which is presumed to be due to Agent Orange exposure. The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death and dismissed the DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 claim as moot.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's headaches are at least as likely as not caused by his service-connected traumatic brain injury, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.