The veteran's claims for service connection and initial evaluations were denied. The Board found no current residuals of heat exhaustion, but granted a 10% rating for cervical spine spondylosis beginning September 23, 2002.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence of current residuals of heat exhaustion. For cervical spine spondylosis, the veteran's symptoms were found to be consistent with DJD and foraminal stenosis at C6-7, warranting a 10% rating beginning September 23, 2002.
- Claimed conditions
- Cervical Spine Spondylosis, Residuals of Heat Exhaustion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 2, 2003
- Citation
- 0311161
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 425 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0311161.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied an initial increased rating for diabetes mellitus type II and remanded the claims for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, right shoulder strain with acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis and tendinitis, cervical spine spondylosis, left knee degenerative arthritis, right knee degenerative arthritis, and thoracolumbar scoliosis and lumbar spine degenerative changes.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's cervical spine spondylosis and right and left upper extremity radiculopathy were rated based on their respective conditions, with different disability ratings granted at various times. The decision does not specify an effective date for any rating changes.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection and TDIU were denied, with the effective date of all grants being February 2, 2016.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's current left knee, left shoulder, and neck disorders are not related to her military service. The VA examiner concluded these conditions are more likely due to a civilian motor vehicle accident in 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.