The Board has granted the veteran's claim for restoration of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disability (TDIU) for the period from January 1, 1990, to April 7, 2000.
The deciding factor: The decision was made in accordance with the provisions of direct service connection and did not involve any specific exposure basis or presumption as per the VCAA requirements.
- Claimed conditions
- Service-connected disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 4, 2003
- Citation
- 0311494
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,500 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0311494.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's burial allowance and transportation reimbursement have been fully awarded, leaving no room for additional benefits. The Veteran was not buried in a state cemetery, thus denying eligibility for a burial plot or interment allowance.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance is granted from September 26, 2017 to June 10, 2018. The Board found that by the time of his June 2018 C&P Exam, he no longer required regular aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for retroactive payment of benefits for additional dependents was denied as he did not submit the necessary information within the specified timeframe and failed to inform VA about his older children who were attending school.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's motion for an earlier effective date for TDIU based on CUE in a May 2013 decision, finding that the correct facts were known and applied correctly.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.