The Board has determined that the veteran's ilioinguinal nerve entrapment does not warrant a rating higher than 10 percent, as there is no evidence of severe to complete paralysis or mild/moderate paralysis.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not show any manifestations of severe to complete paralysis or mild/moderate paralysis of the ilioinguinal nerve. The veteran's gait remained normal and his muscle strength was unaffected.
- Claimed conditions
- ilioinguinal nerve entrapment
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 20, 2003
- Citation
- 0313475
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0313475.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a 10% evaluation for ilioinguinal nerve entrapment. The claim of service connection for bilateral inguinal hernias is remanded due to new evidence suggesting possible service or service-connected causation.
- Denied
The Board denied increased ratings for service-connected right side ilioinguinal nerve entrapment and incomplete paralysis of the left genitofemoral nerve, finding that the conditions are primarily manifested by sensory disturbance and pain without evidence of motor function impairment or other complications.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was caused by an accidental overdose of prescribed medications for his service-connected disabilities, and thus service connection is granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran is seeking compensation for complications following his inguinal hernia surgery and subsequent nerve resection. The VA has requested additional evidence to support the claim, including medical records from Dr. Callaghan and treatment records from the Memphis VAMC and Nashville VAMC since July 2000.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.