The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining a VA compensation and pension physical examination to evaluate the veteran's service-connected hypoplastic anemia. The veteran is also advised that failure to report for this examination may result in denial of his claim.
The deciding factor: The RO failed to provide adequate notice of the information and evidence necessary to substantiate the appellant's claims, as required by the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
- Claimed conditions
- hypoplastic anemia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 15, 2003
- Citation
- 0316086
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0316086.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus and respiratory condition are granted, while his hypoplastic anemia claim is denied. The Veteran's respiratory condition is rated at 30 percent prior to November 23, 2012.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's TDIU claim is granted due to his service-connected hypoplastic anemia, which has significantly impacted his ability to work.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied a higher evaluation for hypoplastic anemia, finding that the Veteran's condition did not meet criteria warranting a rating in excess of 30 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to a need for more information regarding the veteran's employment history.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.