The Board has ordered further development in the veteran's case, including obtaining medical records and arranging for VA examinations. The appeal is currently remanded to allow for additional evidence collection and analysis.
The deciding factor: The decision is pending further development as requested by the court and board regulations.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of sensation, drawing of muscles
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 28, 2003
- Citation
- 0317828
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0317828.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of her service-connected left foot Lisfranc fracture.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's increased rating claim for his right upper extremity disability was denied as the evidence did not show that his condition warranted a higher rating. The TDIU claim was also denied due to insufficient evidence showing he is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain outstanding private treatment records and to schedule a VA examination. The increased rating claim for residuals of a laceration of the right ring and middle fingers with decreased extension and with ulnar nerve damage, loss of sensation, and decreased grip strength of the right upper extremity will be adjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's left arm disability was not proximately due to or the result of VA carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on the part of VA in furnishing reasonable care.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.