The Board has determined that further development is needed to determine the current severity of the veteran's service-connected bilateral pterygium and its impact on his vision. The RO will obtain additional medical records, provide notice under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), and schedule a VA ophthalmological examination.
The deciding factor: The decision is remanded due to conflicting evidence regarding the veteran's vision loss and the need for further development and evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral pterygium
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 31, 2003
- Citation
- 0318410
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0318410.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted an increased rating of 10 percent for bilateral pterygium effective July 5, 2022.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected migraine headaches, pulmonary nodule of the right lung, bilateral pterygium, and residuals of closed rib fracture with associated keloid scar are being remanded for additional examinations to assess their current severity.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and for further development, including scheduling a new VA eye examination.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including sleep apnea, migraine headaches, lumbar spine disorder, left-hand fifth finger disorder, and bilateral pterygium, have rendered him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation since February 22, 2016. As his combined rating is at least 80%, he meets the schedular requirement for a TDIU.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.