The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence and clarification. The case is now being sent back to the RO for the requested development, including obtaining medical records from the VA Medical Center in Louisville, Kentucky, and arranging for a physician's examination to determine the etiology of the veteran's ventral incisional hernia.
The deciding factor: The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed before making a decision on the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- ventral incisional hernia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 28, 2003
- Citation
- 0321682
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0321682.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection and effective date have been remanded due to the complexity of the medical issues involved.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for acquired genetic damage, non-malignant thyroid nodular disease, and esophageal cancer with GERD as well as an initial compensable rating for ventral incisional hernia. The Board found that there was no current disability related to these conditions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for residuals, ventral incisional hernia repair was denied as the evidence did not demonstrate carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of VA.
- Denied
The Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) has denied the veteran's claim for an increased disability evaluation for his ventral incisional hernia, currently rated at 20 percent. The BVA found that the evidence did not support a higher rating as the veteran's hernia is small and operable.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.