The veteran's special monthly compensation was reduced from a rate based on loss of use of both feet to a rate based on loss of use of one foot due to changes in his physical condition. The Board found no CUE, but the Court vacated and remanded the decision.
The deciding factor: The May 9, 1968 rating decision reduced the veteran's special monthly compensation without applying the provisions requiring advance notification of a reduction or termination of benefits due to his receipt of retired pay from the service department.
- Claimed conditions
- Quadriparesis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 4, 2003
- Citation
- 0322761
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0322761.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered a remand for the Veteran's claim of service connection for a neurological disorder, including as due to Agent Orange exposure. The remand is required because the previous VA examination opinion was inadequate and does not provide a reasoned medical explanation connecting the two.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for higher ratings for his cervical spine disability and service connection for quadriparesis are remanded due to outstanding VA treatment records, a need for updated examinations, and inadequate medical opinions.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's injury was due to his willful misconduct, specifically intoxication from alcohol.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's appeal, concluding that his disability resulting from an injury on June 28, 1993, was due to his own willful misconduct.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.