The Board has ordered a remand for further development of the veteran's claim, including an examination to determine the extent and severity of his disability due to the gunshot wound to the neck. The RO is instructed to consider all relevant rating criteria and avoid pyramiding with any other disabilities already rated.
The deciding factor: The decision was not about service connection but rather about determining the appropriate evaluation for the veteran's disability based on a comprehensive examination report.
- Claimed conditions
- gunshot wound to the neck
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 6, 2003
- Citation
- 0322990
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0322990.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, Social Security Administration (SSA) records, and scheduling a VA examination to determine the effect of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities on his employability.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claim for eligibility to VA death benefits, finding that her spouse had no service as a member of the Philippine Commonwealth Army and thus was not eligible for VA benefits.
- Whole decision: Denied
The veteran's claim for special monthly compensation at the aid and attendance or housebound rate is denied as he does not meet the schedular requirements for housebound status due to his service-connected disabilities, and there is no evidence that his need for aid and attendance is solely due to a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's in-service self-inflicted gunshot wound to the neck was not due to willful misconduct, and service connection for residuals of a gunshot wound to the neck is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.