The veteran's claims for restoration of ratings and service connection have been granted. The right and left heel injuries are rated at 0 percent, effective January 1, 2002.
The deciding factor: The RO found that the veteran's current foot conditions do not warrant a higher rating based on the evidence considered in the prior ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- Residuals of a right heel injury, Residuals of a left heel injury, Metatarsalgia of both feet, Gout (right foot)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 18, 2003
- Citation
- 0324463
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0324463.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's right foot disability, including degenerative arthritis and metatarsalgia, was rated at 20 percent prior to July 26, 2022, and remains at that level after July 25, 2022. The disability is currently considered moderately severe.
- Denied
The Veteran's left hip disability is currently rated as 10 percent disabling, but the Board finds no evidence to support a higher rating based on range of motion or other criteria.,The Veteran's left knee disability is currently rated as 10 percent disabling, and the Board finds no evidence to support a higher rating based on range of motion or other criteria.,The Veteran's left heel injury disability is currently rated as 10 percent disabling, but the Board finds no evidence to support a higher rating based on severity or functional impact.,The Veteran's left heel skin graft site disability is currently rated as 10 percent disabling, and the Board finds no evidence to support a higher rating based on the nature of the scar.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.