The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence. The case is now remanded back to the RO for consideration of the new evidence and a determination on the increased disability evaluation claim.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because the Board ordered further development, which requires the RO to review the evidence and make a determination based on the newly obtained information.
- Claimed conditions
- right thoracic outlet syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 15, 2003
- Citation
- 0324867
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0324867.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected right thoracic outlet syndrome and major depressive disorder prevented him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation prior to December 30, 2016. The Board granted TDIU effective March 3, 2015.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for service connection for right thoracic outlet syndrome, COPD secondary to a pulmonary embolism, and an increased rating for left thoracic outlet syndrome with history of subclavian vein thrombosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded to obtain additional VA opinions and examinations, as not all theories of entitlement have been addressed.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected squamous cell carcinoma of the right tonsil and left lateral tongue, status post radical neck dissections, tonsillectomy and left partial glossectomy prior to June 10, 2009, resulted in a combined rating of 80 percent. The Board granted an initial noncompensable (0%) disability rating for the service-connected squamous cell carcinoma of the right tonsil and left lateral tongue, status post radical neck dissections, tonsillectomy and left partial glossectomy prior to June 10, 2009.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.