The Board has remanded the case for additional development and consideration of the claim seeking a rating in excess of 20 percent for the service-connected left leg disability based upon a review of all relevant evidence, including any new evidence received since its most recent consideration.
The deciding factor: The decision is being remanded due to procedural issues and the need for further development of the case.
- Claimed conditions
- stress fracture of the left tibia, callous formation
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 20, 2003
- Citation
- 0328142
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0328142.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's initial compensable rating for service-connected stress fracture residuals of the left tibia was denied from August 28, 2014 to October 15, 2020. From January 1, 2018 onwards, a separate 10 percent rating for instability of the left knee associated with the service-connected stress fracture residuals of the left tibia was granted.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for a bilateral foot disorder, including plantar fasciitis, plantar wart formation, callous formation, tenosynovitis, distal tarsal tunnel syndrome, and left foot bunion formation. The decision finds that the Veteran's current foot disorders are at least as likely as not related to her service due to strain from wearing boots.
- Denied
The Board denied increased ratings for stress fractures of the right and left tibia, as well as a separate rating for vision impairment related to a scar on the Veteran's right eye. The evidence did not support higher disability ratings due to lack of unresponsiveness to treatment or surgery.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to incomplete records and inadequate VA examination. The Veteran is required to provide releases for private treatment records, including those from Drs. P., F., J., K.E., M.D., and L.B., M.D. A new VA examination must be conducted to assess the current severity of his right knee and bilateral tibia disorders.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.