Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board found that the veteran's Substantive Appeal was timely filed, perfecting his appeal of the RO's November 1999 rating decision regarding service connection for a lung disorder due to asbestos exposure.

The deciding factor: The veteran provided good cause for not filing a Substantive Appeal within 60 days of the July 2001 SOC and the RO extended the time limit accordingly.

Claimed conditions
COPD, bronchiectasis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 26, 2003
Citation
0333280

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0333280.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.