Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The veteran's claims for increased ratings of his upper extremity weakness and initial evaluation for bowel incontinence were denied. The RO found that the veteran did not have complete paralysis or loss of use, which are required for higher ratings under the applicable diagnostic codes.

The deciding factor: The evidence showed that the veteran had significant impairment but no complete paralysis or loss of use as required by the rating criteria.

Claimed conditions
Right (major) upper extremity weakness, Left upper extremity weakness
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 5, 2003
Citation
0334042

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0334042.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.