The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected fractured right wrist is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and arranging for VA examinations.
The deciding factor: The case requires further development as indicated by conflicting evidence and incomplete information provided by the veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- fractured right wrist
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 10, 2003
- Citation
- 0334381
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0334381.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected right wrist disability is denied. The issue of entitlement to TDIU due to the service-connected right wrist disability is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right wrist disability is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and review of his claims file. The issue of whether his pre-existing right wrist condition was aggravated by active service remains unresolved.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether a service-connected disability caused or contributed to the Veteran's housebound status and dementia, which in turn may have led to his death.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and increased ratings for residuals of a fractured right wrist and history of tinea cruris/pedis (claimed as jungle rot) were denied. The Veteran was not shown to have PTSD due to in-service events, and his current disabilities did not meet the criteria for compensable initial or higher ratings.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.