The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for cause of death, accrued benefits, and NSC pension benefits due to lack of new and material evidence for the claim of service connection for cause of death.
The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for cause of death.
- Claimed conditions
- shock, massive hemorrhage, blast injury
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 31, 2003
- Citation
- 0336844
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0336844.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's cause of death was due to anoxic brain damage, shock, gastrointestinal bleeding, and portal hypertension. The Board has decided to remand the case for further development regarding the Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II as a contributory cause of his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the cause of the Veteran's death, specifically his claimed asbestos exposure.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for cause of the Veteran’s death and denied nonservice-connected death pension benefits. The Veteran died from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, multiple-organ system failure, shock, and hypertension. There was no evidence linking his death to service or any service-connected disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's death was caused by diabetes, which the appellant claims is related to his service exposure to Agent Orange. The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to determine if the Veteran was exposed to Agent Orange and whether any of his conditions are related to his service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.