The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted, but the claim for service connection for PTSD is still denied as there is no competent evidence linking the diagnosed PTSD to service.
The deciding factor: There is a diagnosis of PTSD, but it does not meet the criteria set forth in 38 C.F.R. § 4.125(a) and there is insufficient credible supporting evidence that the claimed inservice stressors actually occurred.
- Claimed conditions
- Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 6, 2004
- Citation
- 0400165
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,377 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0400165.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevent him from maintaining substantially gainful employment, and a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) is granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether PTSD caused obesity and/or aggravated OSA, which is necessary for a determination of service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of adequate examination and duty to assist. The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, is now before the AOJ for further action.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to deficiencies in its June 2020 decision, including inadequate VA examinations and failure to consider certain private examination reports. The Veteran's PTSD with MDD claim is being remanded for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.