The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a fractured right foot, finding no current evidence of such condition and concluding that any fracture incurred in service did not result in current residuals.
The deciding factor: There is no competent medical evidence showing current residuals of a fracture of the right foot incurred in service.
- Claimed conditions
- fractured right foot
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 15, 2004
- Citation
- 0401543
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 680 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0401543.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's claims for right foot scar, fractured right foot, and related radiculopathy were denied. The claim for service connection for depression was also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for right hip pain associated with his service-connected fracture was remanded.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including his thoracolumbar spine disability and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathies, have rendered him unemployable since October 15, 2019. A TDIU rating is granted from that date.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal was denied as her right foot disability did not meet the criteria for a higher rating prior to July 24, 2015 and from that date onwards. The Board found that the evidence did not support an increased rating due to lack of severe unilateral acquired flatfoot or other specific findings warranting such a rating.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination to assess the current severity of the Veteran's right foot disability and whether her service-connected right foot disability has aggravated her radiculopathy. The claim will be readjudicated after these actions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.