The Board has determined that the veteran's current corneal scar on his right eye is a result of an active herpes simplex virus infection during reserve component duty, which was aggravated by the performance of duties. The evidence supports this conclusion.
The deciding factor: Medical expert opinion established that the veteran's active herpes simplex infection was aggravated by the required performance of duties, leading to corneal scarring.
- Claimed conditions
- corneal scar, right eye
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 21, 2004
- Citation
- 0402095
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,515 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0402095.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The veteran's claim for service connection for chronic kidney disease was granted with an effective date of April 11, 2023. All other claims for increased disability ratings were denied due to the veteran's failure to attend scheduled VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, and thus denied his claim for TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the failure of substantial compliance with the Board's May 2010 remand directives. The case will be readjudicated after appropriate development, including scheduling VA examinations and determining whether referral for extraschedular evaluation is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and consideration of the veteran's claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.