The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to determine the nature and likely etiology of the veteran's claimed lung disorder. The case will be reconsidered after this additional development.
The deciding factor: Further evidence is needed due to unclear nature and etiology of the veteran's claimed pulmonary disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of exposure to asbestos
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 4, 2004
- Citation
- 0403160
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,599 · Granted: 37% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0403160.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeal due to a failure to timely file a Substantive Appeal regarding her service connection claims for Sjogren's syndrome, clinical depression, and residuals of exposure to asbestos. The May 2003 rating decision denying these claims is not on appeal.
- Dismissed
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for the issues of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, residuals of exposure to asbestos, and facet arthropathy at the level of the 5th lumbar vertebra and 1st sacral segment. As a result, these claims are dismissed.
- Granted
The Veteran's lung condition is found to be related to asbestos exposure during service, and the Board grants service connection for residuals of exposure to asbestos.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the grant of service connection for residuals of asbestos exposure was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous, thus restoring service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.