The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to a lack of compliance with VCAA requirements.
The deciding factor: The Joint Motion for Remand instructed the Board to ensure that the VCAA notice requirements were met and to obtain a medical opinion regarding the relationship between current disabilities and service.
- Claimed conditions
- genitourinary dysfunction, residuals of muscle strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 13, 2004
- Citation
- 0404357
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,582 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0404357.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's cause of death is not service-connected.,Coronary artery disease, a presumptively service-connected condition due to herbicide agent exposure, has been granted for accrued benefits purposes.,Cerebral infarction (stroke) with occipital thalamic and brain stem involvement, proximately due to coronary artery disease, is also granted for accrued benefits purposes.,Genitourinary dysfunction, including urinary and fecal incontinence, which was proximately due to the Veteran's stroke, has been granted for accrued benefits purposes.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to a lack of VA examinations and medical opinions. The Veteran's right ankle/foot injury, genitourinary dysfunction, and facial numbness will need further evaluation.
- Denied
The veteran's vision in both eyes is not less than 5/200 and he does not have concentric contraction of the visual field to 5 degrees or less; he is not a patient in a nursing home because of incapacity; and he has not established a factual need for aid and attendance. Therefore, the requirements for special monthly pension based upon the need for regular aid and attendance of another person have not been met.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the relationship between the veteran's current disabilities and service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.