The Board granted a 100% disability rating for subacute bacterial endocarditis, effective from the date of the veteran's death in January 1999.
The deciding factor: The veteran's condition met the criteria for a 100% schedular evaluation under the pre-amended rating criteria due to chronic congestive heart failure.
- Claimed conditions
- subacute bacterial endocarditis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- February 25, 2004
- Citation
- 0405154
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,175 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0405154.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a cardiac disability, including post-operative aortic valve replacement with subacute bacterial endocarditis and congestive heart failure, claimed as secondary to ionizing radiation. The case is now before the Board for further appellate review.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's condition warranted in-patient treatment at a private hospital due to an emergency medical condition, and payment or reimbursement for this care is granted.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for mitral valve disease with postoperative valve replacement and coronary artery disease, as well as subacute bacterial endocarditis, both claimed as due to exposure to herbicides during his military service. The evidence did not support a causal link between these conditions and his service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.