The veteran is seeking payment for unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Chandler Regional Hospital on February 22, 2003. The case involves the availability of VA facilities and whether a medical emergency existed. Additional development is needed to determine distances between the private hospital and the nearest VA facility.
The deciding factor: The decision is remanded due to the need for additional development regarding the distances between the private hospital and the nearest VA facility, as well as compliance with VCAA requirements.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 10, 2004
- Citation
- 0406360
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0406360.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.