The Board found that the veteran's claimed disabilities were not related to his military service, including exposure to radiation. The preponderance of evidence does not support a finding of service connection for any of the conditions.
The deciding factor: VA's Chief Public Health and Environmental Hazards Officer concluded that the veteran's disabilities on appeal could not be attributed to exposure to ionizing radiation in service based on the estimated dose of radiation and scientific data regarding the levels needed to cause these specific disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- Repeated bladder infections, Prostate disorder, Discharge from the mouth (gastroesophageal reflux disorder), Right foot disorder (hallux valgus and hammertoe)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 16, 2004
- Citation
- 0406885
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,055 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0406885.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for bladder and prostate disorders, finding that the evidence does not support a link to service or environmental exposures. The Veteran's claims were based on direct causation rather than presumptive exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, skin cancer, a prostate disorder, and a bladder disorder due to the lack of competent evidence supporting these claims.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for hypertension under the PACT Act and remanded other claims related to kidney and prostate disorders.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a bladder disorder and prostate disorder, finding that the Veteran's conditions were not due to an in-service event, injury, or disease, and are not otherwise etiologically related to service, including exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.