The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of a fracture of the right hand, including deformity of the 4th metacarpal and decreased range of motion of the right wrist, were incurred in active service.
The deciding factor: The evidence supported by credible history and clinical examination results established that the veteran's injuries occurred during service and are related to his current condition.
- Claimed conditions
- fracture of the right hand, deformity of the 4th metacarpal of the right hand, right wrist impairment
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- March 22, 2004
- Citation
- 0407338
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 504 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0407338.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that service connection for PTSD is denied, and the claims of service connection for back impairment, left wrist impairment, right wrist impairment, and sleep impairment other than major depressive disorder with insomnia disorder are remanded for further development.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for left ear hearing loss, flash burn of right eye, left eye injury, fracture of the right hand, and bilateral ankle injuries.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person, or at the housebound rate was denied as he does not meet the criteria for such benefits.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appellant's appeal because he did not file a timely substantive appeal within one year of the August 31, 2004 rating decision.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.