The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a dental injury, finding that his in-service tooth extractions did not constitute service trauma and thus do not qualify him for VA dental treatment. The Board also found no evidence of a current non-service connected dental condition impacting his service-connected rheumatic heart disease residuals.
The deciding factor: The veteran's in-service dental extractions were not considered to be service trauma, which is required for Class II(a) eligibility under VA regulations. Additionally, there was no medical evidence showing that the veteran had a current dental condition affecting his service-connected rheumatic heart disease residuals.
- Claimed conditions
- Rheumatic heart disease residuals, Dental condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 25, 2004
- Citation
- 0407830
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 332 · Granted: 14% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0407830.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the appeals to sever service connection for bladder cancer, acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), and a dental condition secondary to AML. The reasons given are that there was no clear and unmistakable error in granting these conditions of service connection.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted entitlement to TDIU from January 23, 2015 to October 16, 2017 based on the aggregate impact of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities precluding substantially gainful employment. The Board denied service connection for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), finding the evidence persuasively weighs against any relationship to service or service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Veteran's service connection claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder was granted, while claims for other conditions were denied.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a rating in excess of 60 percent for coronary artery disease, entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU), and service connection for a dental condition for treatment purposes.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.