The Board has remanded the case due to failure to comply with VCAA notice and duty-to-assist provisions. The appellant's claim is now pending for further development.
The deciding factor: The decision was not about service connection, but rather whether new and material evidence had been received to reopen a DIC benefits claim.
- Claimed conditions
- DIC benefits
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 26, 2004
- Citation
- 0407919
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,514 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0407919.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the request for an earlier effective date for DIC benefits because the claim was received on October 7, 2020, which is considered the effective date.
- Denied
The Board dismissed the claims of entitlement to service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death and entitlement to DIC benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1318 in a final decision dated August 11, 2010. The moving party's motion for revision or reversal on grounds of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) was denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claim for Parents' DIC benefits from January 1, 2005 due to a lack of adequate verification of income.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the appellant timely filed a notice of disagreement with respect to the November 2012 decision denying DIC benefits and nonservice-connected death pension. The appeal is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.