The Board denied the veteran's claim for compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151, finding that his urinary incontinence was a reasonably foreseeable result of his prostate surgery performed at a VA Medical Center in September 1999 and not due to carelessness or negligence on the part of VA.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the veteran's urinary incontinence was a reasonably foreseeable result of his prostatectomy, which is considered a direct service connection as it did not involve any presumption, secondary condition, aggravation, reopening, or other special circumstances.
- Claimed conditions
- Urinary Incontinence
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 7, 2004
- Citation
- 0409100
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0409100.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an earlier effective date, a higher rating for urinary incontinence, and a higher rating for lumbar spine disability.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, and granted an initial 10 percent rating for right lower extremity radiculopathy from December 1, 2007, through February 11, 2020.
- Partly granted
The Veteran was granted special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance but denied for housebound status.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for urinary incontinence and rectal dysfunction, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating under applicable criteria.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.