The veteran seeks service connection for kidney failure with dialysis. The claim is remanded due to the need for additional medical evidence regarding his disability history from 1969 onwards.
The deciding factor: The claim requires additional medical evidence documenting the veteran's disability history since 1969, which is crucial for proper adjudication of the service connection claim.
- Claimed conditions
- kidney failure with dialysis, hematuria, proteinuria
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 26, 2004
- Citation
- 0410784
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 504 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0410784.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to obtain a VA examination prior to denying the Veteran's claim for service connection for proteinuria. The examiner is asked to determine if there is at least as likely as not that the Veteran's underlying chronic kidney disease is related to his proteinuria, which was documented in his STRs and post-service treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's death was caused by radiation, but the cause of his hematuria and prostate cancer is under review. The Board finds that VA did not obtain a proper medical opinion regarding the relationship between in-service asbestos exposure and the Veteran's death.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hematuria was incurred in service and is not aggravated by service, thus granting service connection for this condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's claims, including hematuria, hiatal hernia, arrhythmia, left knee condition, and right knee condition. The remand requires additional examinations and opinions to address duty-to-assist errors in previous decisions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.