The Board found no basis for a rating in excess of 20 percent under Code 5213, as the evidence did not show additional functional loss due to pain that would further limit motion.
The deciding factor: There has been no persuasive showing of additional functional loss due to pain that would further limit motion so as to result in a higher rating under Code 5213.
- Claimed conditions
- fractured right wrist
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 6, 2004
- Citation
- 0411909
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,500 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0411909.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected right wrist disability is denied. The issue of entitlement to TDIU due to the service-connected right wrist disability is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right wrist disability is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and review of his claims file. The issue of whether his pre-existing right wrist condition was aggravated by active service remains unresolved.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether a service-connected disability caused or contributed to the Veteran's housebound status and dementia, which in turn may have led to his death.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and increased ratings for residuals of a fractured right wrist and history of tinea cruris/pedis (claimed as jungle rot) were denied. The Veteran was not shown to have PTSD due to in-service events, and his current disabilities did not meet the criteria for compensable initial or higher ratings.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.